FARE Act Passed by New York City Council

By Manhattan Real Estate Tracker, December 18, 2024

FARE Act Passed by New York City Council

The FARE Act, also known as Introduction 360-A, became law on December 14, 2024. Mayor Adams did not sign the law. The new rule forbids landlords from charging potential tenants the fees of brokers they engage, and it will go into force 180 days after it is passed.

The full press release by the City Council can be found here.

Corcoran Group Data Indicates Number of Signed Residential Leases Continues to Decline

By Manhattan Real Estate Tracker, September 13, 2024

The latest residential leasing report by Corcoran indicates that while average rents continued to increase by 4%, the number of reported signed leases has declined in eight of the last nine months. The number of signed leases decreased annually by 15% to fewer than 4,800 lease – the lowest level since the early stages of the pandemic in June 2020. Corcoran concludes that “a larger portion of Manhattan’s renters have decided to stay put.”

Gary Malin, Chief Operating Officer, The Corcoran Group stated:

“Median rents in both Manhattan and Brooklyn continued their rise during June and are now at new all-time highs in both boroughs. However, it is important to note that the number of lease signings slowed on both sides of the East River, falling a substantial 14% and 23% in Manhattan and Brooklyn, respectively, when compared to May. Historically, activity increases as we enter summer, so the record-high pricing might be keeping some apartment seekers on the sidelines or choosing to explore options in other boroughs or locales. It will be interesting to see if this trend reverses as we move through the season. At a certain point, there is a limit to how much a renter is willing — or able — to pay. Barring a turn-around, landlords may need to increase incentives or make the necessary adjustments to spur greater numbers of tenants to act.”

Real Estate Agents Rally to Stop Intro 360 at New York City Hall

Real Estate Agents Rally to Stop Intro 360 at New York City Hall

By Manhattan Real Estate Tracker, June 12, 2024

Rally to stop Intro 360 real estate New York

Real estate agents and brokers came out this morning to City Hall in Downtown Manhattan today to rally against Intro 360 which would require only those who hire a real estate agent to the broker fee. While all commissions are negotiable, typically the broker fee for leasing an apartment is 15 percent of the first year’s rent. New York City is unlike any city in the country, Manhattan Real Estate Tracker strongly opposes Intro 360.

According to the co-sponsor of the measure, City Council member Chi Ossé, renters deposit $10,000 on average for a new home. One major expense he wants to eliminate is the mandatory broker fee. However, landlords will simply raise the rent and in the long run, the renter would have paid more in rent than if they paid a broker fee and received a lower starting rent.

Tenants claim that they had to pay the broker fee even though “they didn’t hire a broker.” When an agent markets an apartment for rent and a potential tenant inquires about it, it was the agent’s experience and knowledge of real estate and marketing that not only secured the exclusive listing but also generated the call. This work has value and in certain cases, the agent should be compensated by the renter.

Links to local online articles regarding today’s rally and Intro 360 from local New York television stations can be found below.

ABC 7 New York NYC Council considers shifting broker fees to landlords – ABC7 New York (abc7ny.com)

CBS 2 New York Public hearing on NYC real estate broker fee reform gets heated. What people on both sides of the issue are saying. – CBS New York (cbsnews.com)

Article from the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) regarding Intro 360:

1,500 Agents Rally at City Hall to Oppose Broker Fee Bill | Rebny

Rally at City Hall to Oppose Bill Int. 360 that Would Stop Agents of a Landlord from Collecting a Broker’s Fee from a Renter

Manhattan Real Estate Tracker will be attending the rally at City Hall on Wednesday, June 12, 2024 to oppose Int. 360. This bill would stop real estate brokers and agents of a landlord from collecting a broker’s fee from a renter. All agents and brokers can attend to support the opposition of this bill.

The City Council states, “This bill would require an individual who is a representative or an agent of a property owner or a prospective tenant in a residential rental real estate transaction to collect fees charged in the transaction from the party employing the individual. The provisions of this bill would not impact the collection of fees by a landlord or property owner.”

Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services

MAY 15, 2024

Advance Estimates of U.S. Retail and Food Services

Advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for April 2024, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $705.2 billion, virtually unchanged (±0.4 percent) from the previous month, but up 3.0 percent (±0.5 percent) above April 2023. Total sales for the February 2024 through April 2024 period were up 3.0 percent (±0.5 percent) from the same period a year ago. The February 2024 to March 2024 percent change was revised from up 0.7 percent (±0.5 percent) to up 0.6 percent (±0.1 percent).

Retail trade sales were virtually unchanged (±0.4 percent) from March 2024, but up 2.7 percent (±0.5 percent) above last year. Non-store retailers were up 7.5 percent (±1.6 percent) from last year, while food services and drinking places were up 5.5 percent (±2.1 percent) from April 2023.

What are Rent Controlled and Rent Stabilized Apartments in New York City

Programs for regulating rent, known as rent control and rent stabilization, are in place in several communities around New York State. Rent regulation has two purposes: first, to shield tenants in privately held buildings from unlawful rent hikes; second, to enable building owners to maintain their properties while making a fair profit. Of the two rent regulation schemes, rent control is the more established one. It was first implemented in response to the housing scarcity that followed World War II and is typically applicable to structures built before 1947. In general, rent stabilization applies to apartments that were freed from rent control and buildings constructed after 1947 but before 1974. It also includes buildings that are eligible for tax incentives under J-51, 421-a, and 421-g. The apartments that are eligible for these tax benefit programs are determined by their own set of regulations.

Rent stabilization outside of New York City is also referred to as ETPA, or the Emergency Tenant Protection Act, and it’s legal in a few counties and places (see Fact Sheet #8). Rent stabilization can also apply to housing accommodations whose rentals are set by public benefit corporations, DHCR, and other government bodies, as outlined in the rent regulations.

Rent Stabilization
In addition to limiting the amount of rent increases, rent stabilization offers tenants protections. Tenants are entitled to the provision of necessary services, the renewal of their leases, and are not subject to eviction unless there are legally permissible reasons. Tenants have the option to extend their leases for one or two more years. Tenants can use a number of forms developed by the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to make pertinent complaints. After serving the owner with the complaint and gathering evidence, DHCR must issue a formal order that is appealable.

DHCR has the authority to lower rent and impose civil penalties on the owner in cases when a tenant’s rights are infringed. Should you fail to maintain services, your rent may be lowered. If there is an overcharge, the DHCR may impose interest penalties or triple damages that must be paid by the tenant.

Rent Control
Rent control restricts the amount of rent an apartment owner can charge as well as the owner’s ability to evict residents. Additionally, tenants are entitled to certain necessities. Since tenants are regarded as “statutory” tenants, owners are not obligated to provide renewal leases. Tenants can use a number of forms developed by DHCR to file pertinent concerns. After serving the owner with the complaint and gathering proof, DHCR is authorized to issue a written order that is appealable. Rents may be lowered and civil penalties may be imposed by DHCR on the owner in the event that a tenant’s rights are infringed. Reduced rent is a possibility if services are not kept up. When there is an overcharge, the DHCR may determine the legally collectible rent.

Please refer to an attorney for legal advice regarding your specific situation. Additional information can be found at the Department of Homes and Community Renewal.

Gross Domestic Product, First Quarter 2024 (Advance Estimate)

From the US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2024 (table 1), according to the “advance” estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the fourth quarter of 2023, real GDP increased 3.4 percent.

The GDP estimate released today is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision by the source agency (refer to “Source Data for the Advance Estimate” on page 3). The “second” estimate for the first quarter, based on more complete source data, will be released on May 30, 2024.

Real GDP: Percent change from preceding quarter

The increase in real GDP primarily reflected increases in consumer spending, residential fixed investment, nonresidential fixed investment, and state and local government spending that were partly offset by a decrease in private inventory investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased (table 2).

The increase in consumer spending reflected an increase in services that was partly offset by a decrease in goods. Within services, the increase primarily reflected increases in health care as well as financial services and insurance. Within goods, the decrease primarily reflected decreases in motor vehicles and parts as well as gasoline and other energy goods. Within residential fixed investment, the increase was led by brokers’ commissions and other ownership transfer costs as well as new single-family housing construction. The increase in nonresidential fixed investment mainly reflected an increase in intellectual property products. The increase in state and local government spending reflected an increase in compensation of state and local government employees. The decrease in inventory investment primarily reflected decreases in wholesale trade and manufacturing. Within imports, the increase reflected increases in both goods and services.

Compared to the fourth quarter, the deceleration in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected decelerations in consumer spending, exports, and state and local government spending and a downturn in federal government spending. These movements were partly offset by an acceleration in residential fixed investment. Imports accelerated.

Current‑dollar GDP increased 4.8 percent at an annual rate, or $327.5 billion, in the first quarter to a level of $28.28 trillion. In the fourth quarter, GDP increased 5.1 percent, or $346.9 billion (tables 1 and 3).

The price index for gross domestic purchases increased 3.1 percent in the first quarter, compared with an increase of 1.9 percent in the fourth quarter (table 4). The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index increased 3.4 percent, compared with an increase of 1.8 percent. Excluding food and energy prices, the PCE price index increased 3.7 percent, compared with an increase of 2.0 percent.

Personal Income

Current-dollar personal income increased $407.1 billion in the first quarter, compared with an increase of $230.2 billion in the fourth quarter. The increase primarily reflected increases in compensation and personal current transfer receipts (table 8).

Disposable personal income increased $226.2 billion, or 4.5 percent, in the first quarter, compared with an increase of $190.4 billion, or 3.8 percent, in the fourth quarter. Increases in compensation and personal current transfer receipts were partly offset by an increase in personal current taxes, which are a subtraction in the calculation of DPI. Real disposable personal income increased 1.1 percent, compared with an increase of 2.0 percent.

Personal saving was $755.7 billion in the first quarter, compared with $815.5 billion in the fourth quarter. The personal saving rate—personal saving as a percentage of disposable personal income—was 3.6 percent in the first quarter, compared with 4.0 percent in the fourth quarter.

Source Data for the Advance Estimate

The GDP estimate released today is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision by the source agency. Information on the source data and key assumptions used in the advance estimate is provided in a Technical Note and a detailed “Key Source Data and Assumptions” file posted with the release. The second estimate for the first quarter, based on more complete data, will be released on May 30, 2024. For information on updates to GDP, refer to the “Additional Information” section that follows.

*          *          *

Next release, May 30, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. EDT
Gross Domestic Product (Second Estimate)
Corporate Profits (Preliminary Estimate)
First Quarter 2024

New York City Mayor Adams Releases New Budget

From NYC.gov:

NEW YORK – New York City Mayor Eric Adams today released the City of New York’s balanced $111.6 billion Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Executive Budget. Mayor Adams’ budget builds on the administration’s actions, since last fall, to stabilize the city’s fiscal outlook, and has positioned the city to backfill long-term programs that had only been funded with temporary stimulus funds while making the investments that double down on the city’s efforts to strengthen public safety, rebuild the economy, and make the city more livable. These investments will specifically add more police officers to city streets and subways, protect educational programs with city and recurring state funds and increase access to early childhood education, provide support for thousands of cultural institutions, and boost programs that improve the quality of life for working-class New Yorkers. By virtue of Mayor Adams’ strong fiscal management and better-than-expected revenue, the Adams administration balanced the budget, stabilized the city’s fiscal position and outlook, and prevented major service cuts, tax hikes, or layoffs.

FY24 and FY25 remain balanced, with outyear gaps of $5.5 billion, $5.5 billion, and $5.7 billion in Fiscal Years 2026 through 2028, respectively. Growth of $2.2 billion in FY25 over the Preliminary Budget is driven by stronger than expected economic activity in FY24 and an improved outlook in FY25.

“When we came into office two years ago, during the height of another wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were determined to protect public safety, rebuild our economy, and make our city more livable for working-class New Yorkers,” said Mayor Adams. “We have made great strides in these commitments, and today, crime is down, jobs are up, our streets are cleaners, we’re taking on major quality of life issues, and we have financed the most newly constructed affordable housing in a single year in our city’s history. Thanks to our strong fiscal management, we are able to invest in the things that matter to New Yorkers in this Fiscal Year 2025 Executive Budget, including public safety, early childhood education, and the needs of working-class people. As New York City moves toward the future, our core values will continue to guide us as we continue to build a safer, more equitable, and more prosperous city for all New Yorkers.”

Proactive Fiscal Management

On the heels of the pandemic, New York City had to confront substantial challenges, filling holes left where long-term programs were funded with temporary stimulus dollars, and the costs of funding fair labor deals that went years unresolved with city employees. While there are still reasons to remain cautious — like slowing revenue growth in coming fiscal years — by making smart decisions in the November and January plans — like monitoring spending and trimming agency and asylum seeker budgets — as well as better-than-expected revenue, the administration has balanced the budget and steadied the city’s fiscal position.

Strong and decisive action led to achieving a record level of gap-closing savings, and due to better-than-expected economic growth, the administration was able to cancel the previously announced Executive Budget Program to Eliminate the Gap (PEG). As good stewards of taxpayer dollars, the administration still achieved $41 million in agency expense savings, over FY24 and FY25, driven by underspending, where agencies spent less than expected to fund a program or service. This has no impact on service delivery.

Additionally, because continuing to fund the needs of the asylum seeker humanitarian crisis without any limits was not sustainable, Mayor Adams committed to PEG the city’s asylum seeker spending over FY24 and FY25 by a total of approximately 30 percent between the Preliminary and Executive Budgets. As a result of the administration’s policies — including providing 30 to 60 days of housing, legal support, intensified case management, and reducing per diem household costs — more than 65 percent of the asylum seekers who have come through the city’s intake centers have left the city’s care and taken the next steps in their journeys. The administration has successfully cut migrant costs in the Executive Budget by $586 million over FY24 and FY25. Along with $1.7 billion in migrant costs previously cut in the FY25 Preliminary Budget, this brings the two-year total migrant PEG savings achieved to nearly $2.3 billion.

Total savings — including the asylum seeker PEGs — achieved in FY24 and FY25 over the November, January, and April Financial Plans is now $7.2 billion.

Additionally, tax revenue has been revised up by $619 million in FY24 and $1.7 billion in FY25 compared with the Preliminary Budget due to better than anticipated economic performance in 2023 and an improved economic outlook in 2024. These additional revenues were used to help remain balanced in FY24 and FY25. However, tax revenue growth is expected to cool in upcoming fiscal years as the local economy slows, bolstering the fact that the city cannot rely exclusively on revenue growth to resolve fiscal challenges.

Maintaining budget reserves as a hedge against the unexpected is a critical part of the administration’s strong financial management strategy. The FY25 Executive Budget maintains a near-record level $8.2 billion in reserves, including $1.2 billion in the General Reserve, $4.8 billion in the Retiree Health Benefits Trust Fund, $250 million in the Capital Stabilization Reserve, and $1.96 billion in the Rainy-Day Fund.

FY25 Priorities

The FY25 Executive Budget enhances safety and doubles down on the Adams administration’s efforts to continue to bring down crime by adding two more police classes this year and putting 1,200 additional police officers on the streets by adding July and October New York City Police Department (NYPD) classes. Now, all police academy classes will be fully funded in 2024. This adds 2,400 new police officers to city streets in the coming year and puts New York City on the path to having a total of 35,000 uniformed officers protecting New Yorkers in the coming years.

The Adams administration’s strong fiscal management, combined with a stronger than anticipated economic performance in 2023, helped put the city in a position to fund a number of stimulus-funded long-term programs that could be backfilled with city and state dollars. In the FY25 Executive Budget, Mayor Adams uses $514 million in city and recurring state funds to support key education programs that had been funded with expiring stimulus dollars, including mental health care, career readiness, and literacy programs for New York City public school students.

Additionally, the administration is making multiple investments in New York City’s cultural sector by allocating more than $22 million over the next three fiscal years to the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. These investments will support over 1,000 cultural organizations, which make up the heart and soul of New York City and are the cornerstone of its economic rebound. 

More specifically, some highlighted investments of the FY25 Executive Budget include:

Keeping New Yorkers Safe

  •  Doubling down on decreases in homicides and shootings by adding 1,200 more police recruits between the July and October NYPD classes, putting New York City on a path to have 35,000 uniformed officers in the coming years ($62.4 million, FY25).
  • Funding for the Job Connections initiative, which will connect 500 young New Yorkers at risk of gun violence with career readiness and green job placement programs ($16.9 million, FY25).
  • Expanding the Crisis Management System to support additional Cure Violence coverage areas and additional mental health services in gun violence safety precincts ($8.6 million, FY25).
  • Supporting the Neighborhood Safety Alliance, which fosters collaboration between communities, actors, law enforcement agencies, and city services to reduce gun violence in six additional precincts ($2.5 million, FY25).

Securing a Better Future for New York City Children

  • Supporting citywide 3-K expansion as it transitions from its original stimulus funding source ($92 million, FY25).
  • Supporting nearly 500 social workers and psychologists who provide mental health supports in schools ($74 million, FY25) *.
  • Maintaining funding for special education Pre-K providers to increase service hours, and resources for DOE-related services and evaluation teams ($56 million, FY25)*.
  • Investing in pathways programs that facilitate career pathways programs in high schools — offering apprenticeships, career-readiness, and access to college credits ($53 million, FY25)*.
  • Arts funding programming ($41 million, FY25).
  • Literacy and dyslexia programs and academic assessments for both English language arts, and math ($17 million, FY25)*.
  • Funding for coordinators for students in temporary housing in schools and shelters ($17 million, FY25)*.
  • Bilingual education funding for curriculum and assessment, teacher preparation and staffing, professional learning, and multilingual family and community engagement for 100 bilingual programs ($10 million, FY25)*.
  • Increasing the availability of in-school early childhood education classes and services for students with special needs ($25 million, FY25).
  • Maximizing enrollment in early childhood education programming and helping parents connect with Pre-K and 3-K seats with an extensive media outreach and marketing campaign ($3.5 million, FY25).

 * Indicates funded with recurring state resources.

 Investing in Cherished Cultural Institutions

  • Allocating funding for the Cultural Institutions Group, 34 cultural nonprofits operated on city-owned property ($5.4 million, FY25).
  • Investing in the Cultural Development Fund, which supports over 1,000 cultural nonprofits across the city ($2.2 million, FY25).

 Putting More Money in the Pockets of Working-Class New Yorkers

Climate Budgeting

Mayor Adams is taking a critical step towards making the city cleaner and greener over generations to come in his FY25 Executive Budget. New York City is the first big city in America, and among a small elite group of cities internationally, to implement climate budgeting, a system that integrates climate targets and considerations into the budget process to help achieve the city’s goals of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and resiliency to climate threats. Critically, climate impact will now be one of the many factors that will be balanced when allocating the city’s limited resources to ensure resources are aligned with sustainability and resiliency needs. And — for the first time and moving forward — the Executive Budget will also include a Climate Budgeting publication that will include an analysis of the city’s new and ongoing climate investments and progress toward emissions goals.

Consumer Price Index Summary

United States Department of Labor

U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

Economic News Release

PressOffice@bls.gov

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX – MARCH 2024

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.4 percent in March on a seasonally adjusted basis, the same increase as in February, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 3.5 percent before seasonal adjustment. The index for shelter rose in March, as did the index for gasoline. Combined, these two indexes contributed over half of the monthly increase in the index for all items. The energy index rose 1.1 percent over the month. The food index rose 0.1 percent in March. The food at home index was unchanged, while the food away from home index rose 0.3 percent over the month. The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.4 percent in March, as it did in each of the 2 preceding months. Indexes which increased in March include shelter, motor vehicle insurance, medical care, apparel, and personal care.

The indexes for used cars and trucks, recreation, and new vehicles were among those that decreased over the month. The all items index rose 3.5 percent for the 12 months ending March, a larger increase than the 3.2-percent increase for the 12 months ending February. The all items less food and energy index rose 3.8 percent over the last 12 months. The energy index increased 2.1 percent for the 12 months ending March, the first 12-month increase in that index since the period ending February 2023. The food index increased 2.2 percent over the last year.